<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HDR from one single image</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eirikso.com/2007/08/20/hdr-from-one-single-image/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eirikso.com/2007/08/20/hdr-from-one-single-image/</link>
	<description>The personal web site of Eirik Solheim</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:07:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary Martin</title>
		<link>http://eirikso.com/2007/08/20/hdr-from-one-single-image/comment-page-1/#comment-3968</link>
		<dc:creator>gary Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eirikso.com/2007/08/20/hdr-from-one-single-image/#comment-3968</guid>
		<description>amazing post. i haven&#039;t touched the camera for a few years, but you have inspired me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amazing post. i haven&#8217;t touched the camera for a few years, but you have inspired me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pål Jensen</title>
		<link>http://eirikso.com/2007/08/20/hdr-from-one-single-image/comment-page-1/#comment-3135</link>
		<dc:creator>Pål Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eirikso.com/2007/08/20/hdr-from-one-single-image/#comment-3135</guid>
		<description>I tried both versions Basic and Pro (free Trail).
My experience is that the basic is too basic, but the pro version looks promising to me.
I tested some shots in RAW on my Canon 400D. I used the function of tone mapping directly within Photmatirx and was satisfied with the result.
The clear advantage of this is that you only need on image (RAW) itâ??s a one step solution within the SW with in my view acceptable (god?) results.

P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried both versions Basic and Pro (free Trail).<br />
My experience is that the basic is too basic, but the pro version looks promising to me.<br />
I tested some shots in RAW on my Canon 400D. I used the function of tone mapping directly within Photmatirx and was satisfied with the result.<br />
The clear advantage of this is that you only need on image (RAW) itâ??s a one step solution within the SW with in my view acceptable (god?) results.</p>
<p>P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knut</title>
		<link>http://eirikso.com/2007/08/20/hdr-from-one-single-image/comment-page-1/#comment-3134</link>
		<dc:creator>Knut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 06:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eirikso.com/2007/08/20/hdr-from-one-single-image/#comment-3134</guid>
		<description>I tried the tecnique usingen one RAW file and got the following result: http://www.sandvik.bz/2007/08/20/hdr-fotografering/
However I didn&#039;t find tonemapping function in the free edition of Photomatrix. Maybe this is one of the limitations of being cheep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried the tecnique usingen one RAW file and got the following result: <a href="http://www.sandvik.bz/2007/08/20/hdr-fotografering/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sandvik.bz/2007/08/20/hdr-fotografering/</a><br />
However I didn&#8217;t find tonemapping function in the free edition of Photomatrix. Maybe this is one of the limitations of being cheep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

