They stole an image of my son and just had to pay $4000
copyright, digital rights, law, photography | (138)
Edit:
I seems like I've done a bad job selecting words for my headline. Some people think that I am complaining because I "just" got $4000. I'm not complaining. It's a not-so-successful formulation to say that this happened recently. Or like one of the commenters over at Reddit said:
"I assume that "just" refers to time. Meaning they only now, a short while ago, had to pay $4000."
About a year ago I was surprised when I saw an image of my son in an ad for a shop called "Vinderen Elektriske", selling electronics.
I immediately contacted the editor of the magazine in question, ...