Bernt and Bjarne has started a very important blog. The Champagne Blog. It will be interesting to see what they will bring. You can already learn how to sabre a bottle of sparkling beverage, and it will be interesting to follow their experiment on how to turn cheap white wine into a sparkling beauty. :-)
If you want to try to sabre a bottle of champagne, it might be smart to start out with something that’s not too expensive. However, we don’t want to drink bad champagne, so it has to be a good one. I can recommend Tarlant Brut Zero. An excellent budget champagne. If you happen to live in Norway the product number at the Norwegian Vinmonopolet is 4673801. And the price is a ridiculous NOK 215,-
Still, if you want to do your training on something even cheaper, try the Cremant de Bourgogne Brut Millésimé from Les Caves des Hautes Côtes. The closest you can get to champagne without actually drinking the real thing. Product number 731401, NOK 136,-
I have talked about placeshifting here before. Unfortunately, the excellent ORB application is not available for Mac, but maybe this can solve some of the needs for the mac users out there that want to access their media through the web? No TV or video streaming, but music and pictures.
The companies making mobile phones know it. They have a huge advantage over all other gadget vendors. The mobile phone has become the device that you really can’t do without. If you forget your iPod while heading off for work it’s not that serious. If you forget your digital camera, you’ll not return unless you really, really need it that day. It is the phone that makes you turn around and travel all the way back home to get it. So, they have a very valuable place in your pocket.
The only reasons for not having all your gadgets in the same device are:
There is absolutely nothing that indicates that it should be impossible to make a device that has a reasonable price, good usability, perfect size and includes the functionallity of my phone, MP3-player and digital camera in the near future. However, there is another huge difference between my Sony Digital Camera and the one in my Nokia Phone.
The operating system
The camera in my Nokia is a camera with an operating system. Basically that gives endless possibilities to system developers and third parties making additions and extra functionallity. Marking my pictures with data from my bluetooth GPS. Giving my camera advanced direct blogging functionallity. Supporting new image formats. Analyzing and recognizing patterns in the picture. Combining the camera with the networking functionallity of UMTS, GPRS and bluetooth.
All of this is impossible in my Sony Cybershot DSC-P150. I need to buy a new camera to give it new functionallity.
The same goes for my MP3-player. The stupid dependence on firmware from Creative is an example. With an open API in my MP3-player someone would have fixed that before Creative could put down their first meeting in the group that makes firmware.
So, even if you don’t want all your gadgets in the same device, gadgets without an operating system are sooo last century…
….that the flowers on the cucumber plant smells wonderful?
Now you know. There will definitely never be any cucumbers on our balcony, but at least we have had the pleasure of some flowers with a very nice fragrance.
And you have also learnt that it is impossible to know what to expect on eirikso.com
Is that a good thing? Will I loose my regular readers if I start to write about stuff that is not about home media technologies?
I guess you’ll speak up if you hate posts like this?
At some point my MSN Messenger keeps telling me that I can now “Call” for free all over the world. I just started wondering, what’s the difference. If I make a “call” or a plain… call?
Because I have quite a bit of people following this blog on RSS you might have missed both the comments and the edits of this post. Well, to put it short: it was a coincidence.
Jon BÃ¸hmer just pointed me to this. I can’t let that one go without a comment. But, I’ll make it a short one.
1. Yes, I totally agree that the ugly, noisy, unstable and $1000 PC will not be a success in everyone’s living room
2. But this one can turn into a classic:
“…the vast majority of Americans will never — I will repeat that — never think of the PC as an entertainment device. The PC is for work and the TV is for relaxation. End of story.”
The media center is not about a noisy $1000 PC in your living room. It’s about an architecture that lets you access your media in a user friendly and convenient way. It’s about the fact that young people can not think of music, video and pictures that is stored anywhere else than on a computer or on a network. It’s about a platform that accepts content and services from flexible feeds and different content creators. It’s about the fact that the computer eventually will be more user friendly and convenient than loads of different boxes, cables, remotes and user manuals.
“The PC is for work and the TV is for relaxation.”
That is if you have a time machine that can drag you back to the ninties and let you stay there.